Nutra
Affstar
A CPA network sits between publishers who send traffic and advertisers who define campaigns; the network can bring offers and publisher access together, while a direct affiliate program connects those parties without the network layer. Affstar describes itself as both a CPA network and an advertiser. The minimum withdrawal appears as 1₽ on affcaptain.com and $1 on partnerkin.com, so the currency is a material point to verify.
Editorial review based on public sources, without hands-on testing; facts checked on 2026-11-01.
This page contains no partner link to this service.
- Name
- Affstar
- Category
- Nutra
- Official site
- affstar.com · No link provided
- Facts checked
Affstar lists offers, tools, and payout models
Third-party sources checked on 2026-11-01 describe Affstar’s offer categories, commission types, and payment methods.
- Offers: health, e-commerce, and info products; 200+ in-house offers, according to affcaptain.com.
- Commission types: CPA and RevShare (partnerkin.com, checked 2026-11-01).
- Payment methods: Capitalist, Payoneer, PayPal, USDT, and wire transfer (affcaptain.com, checked 2026-11-01).
Affstar combines network and advertiser roles
Affstar’s own description combines two roles: it calls itself a CPA network and an advertiser. In category terms, a network connects publishers with advertiser campaigns, while a direct advertiser can run offers itself; the supplied descriptions do not establish that every Affstar offer is owned by the company.
Third-party pages characterize the offer mix in more detail. Aivix.com describes AffStar as a direct advertiser offering white and nutra offers, e-commerce campaigns, and info products. Partnerkin.com describes AFFSTAR as a CPA network with 200+ in-house offers across e-commerce, health/nutra, and info products.
The vendor says it offers white and nutra offers. Mthink.com lists nutra and eCommerce as its verticals, which overlaps with part of the third-party descriptions without settling the ownership of individual campaigns.
Affstar names tracking and campaign tools
Sources disagree on which tracking platform Affstar uses: mthink.com lists an in-house platform, while affcaptain.com names Affise. That difference matters when a publisher is assessing how campaign tracking would fit its existing workflow; neither listing establishes compatibility with a particular setup.
Aivix.com lists postbacks and an API alongside domain parking and a rotator. Partnerkin.com also lists postbacks, APIs, domain parking, and a rotator. These descriptions identify measurement and campaign tools, but do not specify their integration requirements.
Aivix.com also lists ready creatives and manuals. For a publisher, those are campaign materials rather than evidence of how a particular offer is configured, so the offer’s own instructions remain relevant.
Advertisers, publishers, and tools form the map
In the usual network arrangement, advertisers define offers and publishers send traffic; the network connects the two sides. Affstar says it is both a CPA network and an advertiser, while mthink.com describes in-house offer management and quality control.
Aivix.com says AffStar operates its own call center for some offers.
For publishers, the practical question is which role applies to a specific offer and what support or tools accompany it. Mthink.com says affiliates receive direct support, and describes in-house offer management and quality control.
Commission terms come from directory pages
Affcaptain.com lists CPA commissions of up to 5% and custom RevShare rates, while partnerkin.com lists CPA and RevShare commission types. The descriptions identify the models but do not establish which terms apply to a particular offer.
Mthink.com says AFFSTAR offers better payout terms on offers it owns and operates. Aivix.com describes payout rates as increasing with traffic approval quality. These are source descriptions, so publishers should check the applicable offer and account terms rather than treating either as a universal rate.
The minimum withdrawal figures conflict across the two directory pages:
- affcaptain.com — 1₽ — checked 2026-11-01.
- partnerkin.com — $1 — checked 2026-11-01.
Affcaptain.com also lists Net-30 payment frequency. The pages do not resolve which withdrawal currency applies to a publisher’s account.
Geographic reach and payout details need care
Geographic descriptions differ: partnerkin.com says AFFSTAR accepts traffic from worldwide, CIS, and LATAM geographies, while affcaptain.com reports limited offers outside CIS. For planning, that means a broad geographic description should not be treated as confirmation that a particular offer accepts a given market.
The minimum withdrawal is also reported differently: affcaptain.com lists 1₽, and partnerkin.com lists $1. Publishers should resolve the applicable currency before relying on either figure.
Tracking listings conflict as well. Mthink.com identifies an in-house platform, whereas affcaptain.com names Affise. The sources do not establish which description applies to a given account or campaign. Several details are missing; they are listed under What we could not confirm.
AffStar operates its own call center for some offers
- Affcaptain.com describes Affstar as having in-house offers across health, e-commerce, and info products.
- Aivix.com lists postbacks and an API, alongside domain parking and a rotator. Partnerkin.com also lists postbacks, APIs, domain parking, and a rotator.
- Aivix.com reports that Affstar operates its own call center for some offers. Mthink.com describes direct affiliate support and in-house offer management and quality control.
- Affcaptain.com lists Capitalist, Payoneer, PayPal, USDT, and wire transfer as payment methods.
Offer geography shapes publisher fit
The vendor says it accepts all traffic, including traffic from VK and FB.
Partnerkin.com describes traffic acceptance across worldwide, CIS, and LATAM geographies, while affcaptain.com reports limited offers outside CIS. Publishers weighing an offer should confirm its allowed geography and traffic sources rather than infer program access from a network-wide description.
Compare networks by offer-level terms
When comparing providers, publishers can assess offer availability, accepted geographies and traffic sources, tracking, commission models, withdrawal methods, and support terms. In general, checking these details at the offer level helps distinguish a network’s overall description from the conditions of an individual program.
What we could not confirm
- Pricing, plans, trial, and refund terms: details on these terms.
- Rules and restrictions: terms of use and applicable conditions.
- Company details: legal entity, address, and business history.
- Support: available channels and response times.
- Integrations: supported connections and setup requirements.
- Source coverage: independent third-party research was not completed.
Questions about Affstar’s programs and payments
Which traffic sources does Affstar say it accepts?
The vendor says Affstar accepts all traffic, including traffic from VK and FB. That statement describes the vendor’s position; publishers still need to check the conditions of the specific offer they plan to run.
What offer categories do the sources list?
Affcaptain.com describes in-house offers across health, e-commerce, and info products. Aivix.com also describes white and nutra offers, e-commerce campaigns, and info products. These are source descriptions of Affstar’s offer mix, not confirmation that every category is available to every publisher.
Which tracking platform is listed for Affstar?
The tracking descriptions differ: mthink.com lists an in-house platform, while affcaptain.com names Affise. Neither listing establishes which platform applies to a specific account or campaign, so publishers should verify the relevant tracking arrangement before planning around it.
Which commission models do the sources identify?
Partnerkin.com lists CPA and RevShare commission types. Affcaptain.com also lists CPA commissions of up to 5% and custom RevShare rates. The figures and rate descriptions come from directory pages; the applicable terms should be checked for the offer under consideration.
Why do the listed minimum withdrawals differ?
Affcaptain.com lists a minimum payout of 1₽, while partnerkin.com lists a minimum withdrawal of $1. The sources give different currencies, and the available descriptions do not resolve which applies to a particular publisher’s account.
How do the sources describe Affstar’s geographic reach?
Partnerkin.com describes worldwide, CIS, and LATAM traffic, while affcaptain.com reports limited offers outside CIS. These descriptions differ in scope; publishers should check the geography for each offer rather than assume that every program accepts traffic from all listed regions.
Proceed only after checking the offer terms
Fits if your traffic aligns with the geography and acceptance conditions of specific offers, and you can verify the relevant tracking and payment terms.
Probably not if you need one settled description of tracking or withdrawal currency before evaluating programs.
Main risk… treating network-level descriptions as terms for every offer; check the applicable offer and current terms before proceeding.
Sources
Each fact above comes from one of these public pages; the date shows when it was read.
- affstar.comchecked
- affcaptain.com/affiliate-network/affstarchecked
- partnerkin.com/en/c/84/affstarchecked
- aivix.com/affiliate-network/affstarchecked
- mthink.com/network/affstarchecked
How this page was prepared
Editorial team of Account Academy. This page rests on the public sources listed above, which Account Academy checked on 2026-11-01. The service was not tested hands-on by the editors. Any change in the sources leads to an update here.
Last updated:
Right of reply
Do you represent Affstar and see an error or outdated information here? Write to us with evidence. Once the correction is documented, we fix the entry or take it down. Entries are never removed or softened for payment.
- Our contact for replies
- No data available
- Response time
- No data available